Pholc Tales.....

There has been an awakening, have you felt it?

Sensationalist spider stories are appearing again, scurrilous gutter journalism designed to misinform and scare is cropping up and being disseminated by the ignorant. It’s ‘Spider Season’ again.

The Spiderlord is needed once more. The False widow panic may have abated but the tabloids are always ready to jump on a spider scare story and they are not discriminate when it comes to species.

Lets dissect a few headlines shall we? Today, courtesy of that lowest of rags, the Daily Star, we have:

Cannibal spiders hit UK: Killer flesh-eating arachnids set to invade Britain's homes

MILLIONS of cannibal spiders with a monster appetite for flesh are set to swamp Britain.

That's on the website, and in print we have..... 

Yep, that's right, they are talking about the cellar spider. Pholcus phalangioides. 

Excuse me while I laugh, and follow along if you like, though it's paraphrased somewhat, if your familiar with a particular belligerent raccoon then you'll recognise this...

"HAHAHAHAHAAHA"

That's a fake laugh,

"It’s REAL!"

Totally fake

"That was the most real hysterical laugh of my entire laugh because Pholcus is not a threat!"

Not even spiders, well done morons!

Let’s dispense for just one second with the fact that the article in question was ENTIRELY incapable of using the correct images for the article, instead using pictures of Opiliones (Harvestmen) , presumably as they all share the colloquial name ‘daddy longlegs’. And the editors/authors of these publications are clearly braindead imbeciles incapable of doing any research.

So the headline, Cannibal spiders.Most spiders will opportunistically prey upon other species. Its called nature. Killers? Well in the same way that the vast majority of animals upon this planet are killers in the name of survival yes. Flesh eating? Hardly, they have no interest in flesh as you and i would know it, instead sucking the juices out of their prey to leave a dessicated husk. And invade, surely the Star's favourite word when it comes to spiders. They CAN'T INVADE, THEY ARE ALREADY HERE. They have been all along and no one has cared.

Pholcus as a threat is one of the most ridiculous things that I have ever heard in my entire life. There is NO more shy, retiring and benign species that I can think of.

I actually think they are kind of cute. This is a male, as evidenced by the enlargened pedipalps. Looks like he has been in the wars a bit. 

As long as you aren’t another spider.

Yes these things are assassins extraordinaire and they are particularly good at taking down other arachnids, their long spindly legs enabling them to entangle and subdue spiders that you would normally think they would have no chance of capturing. Indeed, these particular spiders are the one species that are more or less guaranteed to eradicate any other spiders from your residence. For this very reason I tend to remove Pholcus from mine. They are THAT effective and I rather like all spiders. You’d think that the Daily Star and other such rags would be championing Pholcus phalangioides, shouting about them from the rooftops and heralding them as the second coming of Christ, the solution to all your spider ills and fears. Alas this is far from the case and the usual ignorance and willful misinformation abounds. 

To be clear, most spiders are opportunistically cannibalistic with many species predating on other spiders, this is survival after all. Pholcus just happens to be outstandingly good at it. This does not just mean that they only eat spiders, they will also quite happily eat other small invertebrates and any escapee locusts that might jump off as I attempt to feed them to tarantulas will often end up as a Pholcus’s dinner. They are also remarkably prolific. And once you have them in your house they are a bit of a bother to get rid of totally.

Thankfully they are quite content to sit in a corner passively, chilling out. These are the spiders that result in having cobwebs in your corners and generally they barely move from their webs. At night they are more likely to take a wander in search of prey but fear not they will leave your sleeping form alone, much preferring to skulk in crevices and hunt out of sight. Again, if you are not a spider you have nothing to fear.

They are already all around you, you see. In your sofa, in the corners, behind furniture. Don't worry, they are entirely uninterested in you.

They are actually a pretty delicate species. Hardly robust, and spindly to the extreme, they are also far from the most photogenic of our spiders bearing little in the way of markings and being ungainly and plain. Usually you will see them either in a web in the corner (sometimes with eggsac like in the picture) or flat against a wall. Their eggsacs are interesting in that they are one of the few species that seems to take a minimal approach when it comes to wrapping the eggs in silk with the individual eggs being quite visible in the cluster, reminding me somewhat of that alien ship from Star Trek (the 60's one). If disturbed they will fall back upon pretty much their only defence mechanism other than scarpering, which is to spin in around in their web as fast as possible, becoming a blur, presumably to confuse and dissuade predators. It actually looks a bit silly. Think of it as a spider tantrum. 

Oh and they are incapable of biting you. Literally cannot penetrate our skin, like the vast majority of British spiders. That story about them having the most potent venom but no fangs? Nonsense, an old wive's tale. Pay it no mind, they have fangs, just ask another spider. But they are too small to penetrate our skin. Simple as that.

So maybe not a lot to love but they are nonetheless a fascinating species. They are as far from a a threat as anything I could imagine and the idea that the paper uses them for its scaremongering sensationalist tripe of an article is laughable.

I'll be back to debunk another article soon,

So till then, keep calm and carry on, after all its only a spider.


all Pholcus images courtesy of Creative Commons Wikipedia.

Crying 'Wolf Spider'

Another day, another article about a complete non event involving a spider, it seems a Spiderlord's work is never done. This time we have The Daily Mail (and to be fair most other news outlets) screaming: Wolf Spider Terrorises 21 year old Childcare Worker! alongside pictures of the least terrified person I think I have ever seen, unless that smile is actually a petrified grimace of utter terror.

Pretty, yes. Terrified? Maybe not. Just one of the four photos the Daily Mail thought it was necessary to have in the article.  photo - Natalie Woods

Now before i start with the debunking and you know, the FACTS. Let me just say this is one of the most shocking displays of shoddy 'journalism' (and i use that word begrudgingly i assure you) i have EVER seen. It is truly shameful that this level of hack publishing is allowed to be disseminated to the public on a mass scale.

That aint no Wolf Spider. Photo Natalie Woods

You see all that has happened is that someone has trawled through Twitter and reported on it. Yep, that's it, gone are the days of journalism being  skullduggery and bungs, shady reporting and getting info via clandestine and underhand methods. Now it seems all you need to do is know how to navigate the realms of social media. A sad, sad day for the 'truth'.

A perfectly reasonable question, blown into a scandalous article by the media. Photo once again, Natalie Woods

So yes, Natalie Woods has basically put up a few statuses about a spider in her shower, like the majority of the general public this has caused her some consternation (clearly she has not been reading my articles) and some alarmed statuses have been posted. At some point somebody has incorrectly identified it as a Wolf spider (Lycosidae) and the paper has picked up on that (after all Wolf Spider sounds SCARY!) and run with it. Contacting an official source for their take on Wolf Spiders and printing the whole kit and caboodle as an article.

Now the facts on the Wolf Spider presented are mostly (but not all) accurate  having come from Jack Fenwick of Naturally Wild 'The Ecology Experts' (not the best source of info compared to an actual academic at a museum or say, the British Arachnid Society but at least they are trying and it sounds nice and official to the everyday man) although as always the Spider is portrayed in the poorest possible light by the paper, Wolf Spiders will not bite unless picked up and grasped firmly when they have no other choice (they normally run away at just under the speed of light when your shadow falls on them). Problem is, as I have already mentioned, this is NOT a Wolf Spider.

THIS is a Wolf Spider (one of many species we have in the UK) Photo - Allen Spiderlord Ward

No, ladies and gentlemen what we have here is likely Erategina atrica (formerly Tegenaria gigantea) the giant house spider. A case could be made for it being Tegenaria domestica - the common house spider but spider taxonomy is frankly a bit of a bitch and always being revised and its not the best photo of the specimen to start off with. Enough to establish genus but not species.  House spiders are pretty large but somewhat skittish and will always leg it rather than make any sign of defense let alone aggression. As summer draws to a close we can expect a great deal more of them to appear as they look to escape the cold. (cue the 'invasion' stories in the paper) They are harmless but tick all the boxes that people seem to have for hating spiders being fast (though not wolf spider-fast) leggy and hairy. However someone called 'wolf' and now we have this state of affairs, and this article for a complete non event.

This is also a Wolf Spider, well technically two! Photo - Allen Spiderlord Ward

THIS is a House Spider. Photo - Allen Spiderlord Ward

It's bizarre, I cant see why Jack Fenwick would divulge the information about Wolf Spiders without asking to see the specimen in question. My sneaking suspicion is that he was just approached generically about Wolf Spiders by the Mail. Even then he seems to have erred. Wolf Spiders are FAR from the biggest spiders in the UK. That's what you get for approaching an 'ecology expert' rather than say, an actual arachnologist. Or even the experienced spider enthusiasts on the British Spider Identification Facebook Page (which I help moderate) who would made the correct identification in a heartbeat. Natalie, ask us next time!

This is also a House Spider - Photo - Allen Spiderlord Ward

I must stress that at no point can blame be apportioned to Natalie, there are no interviews with her at this point, no quotes from her directly to the paper. In fact the quotes taken are from her Twitter account and even from one of her friends comments. Personally I find the whole thing a little creepy. Seriously, I know the modern press has low standards but this really is scraping the barrel now they can't hack phones anymore. I mean the Daily Mail article has more pictures of Natalie (presumably taken from her account) than the spider in question! Like I say, creepy. Way more creepy than the spider that's for sure. 

So overall, another article to be roundly ignored though based upon the top rated comments on the article 'kill it with fire' etc. It is just another example of these wonderful misunderstood creatures getting yet more bad press and I have no doubt another sensationalist article full of misinformation will be produced before too long. 

Like I say, a Spiderlord's work is never done. 

Would the REAL Brazilian Wandering Spider Please Rear up?

As a follow on from my previous article dispelling a few of the spider scare stories that have been propagated by the press over the last year or so, I now wanted to focus on the story that seems to keep rearing its head. Brazilian Wandering Spiders in Bananas. It seems every time that a spot of mould or an innocuous egg sac is found on a bunch of bananas, the collective public loses its head and that old favourite the Brazilian Wandering Spider or Phoneutria, is brought up, as clearly it is definitely that, besides, increasingly as it ‘looks the same as one found with Google’, so it must be! This recently was the case where the Sun boldly proclaimed ‘WORLDS DEADLIEST SPIDER ON THE LOOSE’ on the front page before just a day later printing a one column retraction on page 11, once an apparently more sensible person indicated that the eggs in question were in fact probably not Phoneutria.

Oddly enough the Sun didn't feel the retraction warranted front page coverage. 

As you may have seen in my previous article where I briefly covered this phenomenon, there are many other arachnid culprits identified in fruit and the actual percentage of verified Phoneutria is actually remarkably low. Not to say that it doesn't happen, but certainly we do not need to be jumping to conclusions that the world’s deadliest spider resides within nearly every bunch of bananas! In fact, I have been privy to a study performed by Rick Vetter who has documented spiders found in Banana Shipments to the US. Firstly, as most bananas from Brazil are consumed domestically, most exports will be from Central America, such as Belize, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Guatemala, plus others from Ecuador 3. In a total of 135 spiders found in cargo entering the USA were studied by Vetter, from 1926 to 2014. The vast majority of specimens dated from 2006 onwards. Of these only ONE was found to be a Phoneutria sp.,of medical significance, specifically P. nigriventer. 6 more were P.bolivenisis (another of the same genus, but with relatively benign venom) and 5 were tarantulas. By far the most common findings were a large bodied huntsman spider, Heteropoda venatoria and another harmless wandering spiders Cupiennius chiapaniensis and salei. Both of these species were often misidentified by authorities as Phoneutria species 4..

Cuppienius salei - The AMERICAN Wandering Spider. Relatively harmless and much more likely to be found in bananas - Photo Credit: Mark Chillybean Chilvers

Phoneutria boliviensis   (photo by Stanislav Macík from Czech Arachnological Society - European Arachnology)

Thankfully in this latest article I have a secret weapon, an erstwhile ally and partner in crime. Dr Stuart Longhorn, who is an academic researcher in the arachnology section of Oxford University Museum of Natural History (a collection I am keen to check out myself seeing as the bulk of specimens has been removed from display in London) Between us, and armed with facts and figures (and not just Google identifications and hearsay) we hope to be able to once and for all provide a conclusive report on Phoneutria and the danger (or lack thereof) to the Public.

So, before we get onto Phoneutria itself, let us quickly discuss the myriad of other similar species that you COULD find inhabiting your curved (or not if the EU has anything to do about it!) yellow fruit. 

Phoneutria keyserlingi -   (photo by Stanislav Macík from Czech Arachnological Society - European Arachnology)

A Ctenus sp Africa 'Red Fang'  - Authors own photo and spider. 

Put simply, the eight or so known species of Phoneutria are but a drop in the ocean when compared to the many thousands of known spider species inhabiting the forests of Central and South America. For example a recent count for Central American spiders revealed just under 2,000 kinds are described for the region, of which only ONE is a Phoneutria sp. (i.e. 0.0005%). However, of these and others, there are a myriad of different Huntsman and Wandering spiders that can be easily misidentified by the journeyman as a Phoneutria species. I’d not depend upon the identification skills of even the most experienced medical doctor or nurses either – who are typically not familiar with even the commonest tropical spiders, and beware the pest control companies who often WANT the animal to be something that needs their specialist service to eradicate!. None of these are likely to be well versed on the different species of arachnids in question. The most recent ‘positive identification was made by the family affected because ‘it looked like one on Google’ (even Google finds an impressive number of wrongly identified images when it comes to search pictures of the definitive article – a problem propagated by each and every ADDITIONAL mistake that comes to light, and when newspapers run yet another scare story with another misidentified image!)

Simply keying in on the Red Chelicerae (what the uninitiated call fangs - although they are merely the housing for the muscles acting on the fangs) is insufficient. There are simply so many other species that possess these characteristics, such as Cupiennius chiapanesnis, but also seen in some C.salei and C.getazi. In fact, I have recently come into possession of some African Ctenidae spiders that have even more striking red Chelicerae. Simply put, just because a spider is large, brown with long legs and red mouthparts, that doesn't automatically make it a Brazilian Wandering Spider! As an aside, the name is a misnomer as (a): many Phoneutria species are found outside Brazil and (b): there are a great deal of other types of ‘wandering’ spiders in Brazil that are not Phoneutria (that said, the inadequacy of Common names in Arachnology is probably best a subject for another time.) There ARE features that will allow you to accurately identify Phoneutria species, such as eye arrangement, dark striation (often a central stripe) on the pedipalps, and a thin line along the dorsal cephalothorax. Indeed the most definitive feature of Phoneutria is the presence of a soft brush of hairs on the inner surface of the first appendages nearest the mouth – aka ‘a dense prolateral scopulae on the pedipalp tibiae and tarsi in males and females’, but this aspect, put bluntly, would be a vital taxonomical feature that is far beyond your average housewife or roach killer. 

So just because you have found a small white patch on a bunch of bananas it doesn't mean you have encountered Phoneutria, in fact this picture, mocked up by Dr Longhorn will ably demonstrate why this is likely not the case:
  

See that? I rather think you would notice if you had the real thing on your bananas. Obviously it is still possible to have the spider itself present (as has happened a few times in the UK (after all our border control has been long proven to be rubbish!), but the chances of you having hundreds of them making it over and having to have your hoover destroyed (REALLY?) are frankly infinitesimal. So feel free to keep buying and eating your bananas, after all we cannot have the UK public suffering from a Potassium deficiency can we?

So onwards to discuss the members of the genus Phoneutria itself, and more specifically to address two main points. The main thing that is spouted time and time again about these spiders is that their bite is fatal and that is causes priapism (uncontrollable and painful erections), but are either of these really the case?

First off, as I have already alluded to, ‘Phoneutria’ is a genus, and contains many different species. Amongst these, the potency of the venom varies WILDLY. Get a fully envenomed hit from P. bolviensis and you will likely shrug it off (albeit not particularly enjoy it), but a bite from P. nigriventer will have markedly different implications. A breakdown follows.6

P. nigriventer: Severe Toxicity
P. fera: Severe Toxicity
P. keyserlingi: Moderate to severe Toxicity
P. boliviensis: Low to moderate Toxicity
P. reidyi: Moderate toxicity but venom is 20x more toxic than P.nigriventer for invertebrates whereas nigriventer venom is more toxic to mammals
P. pertyi: Unknown- no studies
P. bahiensis: Unknown- no studies
P.eickstedtae: Unknown- no studies

The last few species were only relatively recent additions to the Phoneutria genus. Likely any information on them with regards to bite reports would be as the result of various misidentifications.7

So as you can see, the seriousness of the bite can greatly differ with the effects varying from benign to fatal, though not often. In fact most fatalities from Phoneutria bites (and there have only been 10 confirmed through 1926 to 2008) have been in small children. So in fact, it might shock you to find out - have the majority of reported medical cases of priapism also been in small children! For example 422 bites were studied between 1984 and 1996, of which 89.9% presented symptoms of MILD envenomation. Here, just one fatality was recorded (a of three year old child). The remaining moderate envenomations (8.5%) were much predominantly in the very old, 70yr+ victims, but no deaths attributed.1

Phoneutria fera This is the display you will get before you get bitten as a last resort. No one can say this is not fair warning.   (photo by Stanislav Macík from Czech Arachnological Society - European Arachnology)

You see, in the countries where they  are naturally found, people DO get bitten by Phoneutria, and it even happens on a regular basis. Due to their nomadic nature (hence the name ‘wandering spiders’), these animals encounter humans fairly often, and although they do not go out of their way to attack or bite humans, these spiders CAN BE highly defensive (not aggressive, any bite is always as a reaction), especially the mature females guarding egg cases or freshly hatched young. The majority of recorded bites in the respectable medical literature are from P. keyserlingi and P. nigriventer, as those species tend to inhabit heavily populated areas in the South of Brazil. Phoneutria have a striking and dramatic defensive display whereby they raise their front four legs vertically, showing off the vivid under-leg colouration as a warning. They then dance from side to side to ward off predators, biting as a last resort anything that gets too close. But even when a bite occurs the envenomation of the bite can vary widely. Not every bite will result in a full load of venom being delivered, they have the capacity to regulate the amount delivered, and can even give what is called a ‘dry bite’ where no venom is used. Put simply venom is a precious commodity to a spider. It is used to incapacitate prey so that the spider can consume at its leisure – and own safety, it is generally not used against predators as then would largely be wasted. Some species such as Atrax robustus (the Sydney Funnel web spider) lack the ability to regulate their venom delivery, and always deliver a fully envenomed bite. That is why bites from that species are always treated with a very effective antivenin (and no one has died from a spider bite in Australia for nearly 40 years). So what may we ask were the amount of recorded bites (in the above study of 422 patients) from Phoneutria that required medical treatment from Antivenin? Just a staggering 2.33%!1 In the vast majority of cases the experienced medical staff determined that very little direct treatment was required. So, even the most toxic species of this spider is hardly the serious threat to humanity that it is portrayed to be (especially by the fear-mongering British media). 

Believe it or not this is a native UK species: Pisaura mirabilis - The Nursery Web Spider: Photo credit Sarah Wells.

And even looking at the venom itself, it seems not all is as it appears. Phoneutria venom contains the toxin Pn-Tx3, a component which attacks the nervous system and inhibits calcium ion channels, causing paralysis, which in extreme instances can lead to cardiac arrest or suffocation. It also severely imbalances levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin, which can lead to excruciating pain. Much is made of the LD50 level of Phoneutria. This is the Lethal Dose in 50% of subjects in a clinical trial, and here such scores are based on rodents. It is true that in laboratory tests only 0.06mg of Phoneutria venom was required to produce 50% fatalities in laboratory mice compared to 3.0mg of Latrodectus venom. Now the problem with these LD50 scores here, is that it assumes the physiology of a rodent is similar to that of a primate. It isn’t. Indeed tests of Pn-Tx3 on primates have yielded remarkably different results. Of course when you think about this, it makes a lot of sense. As I have already mentioned, a spider’s venom is used primarily to subdue their prey, and certainly a small rodent would constitute a great prey item (Phoneutria are not a small spider). Thus it makes evolutionary sense that their venom would be developed to be rather effective on such potential prey animals8..

And as for the Priapsm? Well that’s PnTx2-6 right there, and again tests on rodents have shown that it certainly can have an effect on boosting erectile function. Indeed the toxin is being actively researched for more mainstream medical applications. However the total amount of Priapism reported in the bite study was well under 10% of males affected,1 and typically only present in the very young. Once again, this is just an aspect of the venom that has been misrepresented and twisted over numerous scaremongering articles, and where the often-touted idea of affecting men ‘for more than 4 hours’ comes from is a mystery!

So the venom although highly optimised, is rather effective to kill rodents like rats and mice, but not humans2. This coupled with the low percentage of envenomed bites means the threat from Phoneutria is actually pretty low. The vast percentage of serious symptoms (i.e 0.5% presented in the above study) were in children below 10 years, and the elderly above 70 age. This can be attributed to the reduced efficiency of their physiology to counteract the venom, which are expected to be compromised in the very young and very old. But, let’s put this in perspective. When you consider the tiny likehood of encountering a large specimen of one of the REAL: Phoneutria species in the UK (not one of the countless others misidentified or an eggsac!), coupled with the very small fatality rate after a confirmed bite in their native country LINKED to the very low percentage of serious envenomations, it becomes clear the public essentially has NOTHING to be concerned about, despite what certain publications would have you think!

So as always, Keep calm and carry on. After all, it’s only a spider.

Sources:

1) A CLINICO-EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF BITES BY SPIDERS OF THE GENUS Phoneutria
Fábio BUCARETCHI, Cláudia Regina de DEUS REINALDO, Stephen HYSLOP, Paulo Roberto MADUREIRA, Eduardo Mello DE CAPITANI & Ronan José VIEIRA

2) The effect of PnTx2-6 protein from Phoneutria nigriventer spider toxin on improvement of erectile dysfunction in a rat model of cavernous nerve injury.
Jung AR, Choi YS, Piao S, Park YH, Shrestha KR, Jeon SH, Hong SH, Kim SW Hwang TK, Kim KH Lee JY.

3) Distinguishing Two Often-Misidentified Genera (Cupiennius, Phoneutria) (Araneae: Ctenidae) of Large Spiders Found in Central and South American Cargo Shipments Richard S. Vetter and Stefan Hillebrecht

4) SAMPLING,DISTRIBUTION,DISPERSAL
Spiders (Araneae) Found in Bananas and Other International Cargo Submitted to North American Arachnologists for Identification
RICHARD S. VETTER,1,2,3 RODNEY L. CRAWFORD,4 AND DONALD J. BUCKLE5

5) Lucas, S. M., and J. Meier. 1995. Biology and distribution of spiders of medical importance, pp. 240–258. In J. Meier and J. White [Eds.]. Handbook of clinical toxicology of animal venoms and poisons. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

6) Martins, R., and R. Bertani. 2007. The non-Amazonian species ofthe Brazilian wandering spiders ofthe genus Phoneutria Perty, 1833 (Araneae: Ctenidae), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 1526: 1–36.

7) Simó, M., and A. D. Brescovit. 2001. Revision and cladistic analysis ofthe Neotropicalspider genusPhoneutria Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Ctenidae) with notes on related Ctenidae. Bull. Brit. Arachnol. Soc.12: 67–82.

8) 7. COSTA, S.K.P.; MORENO, J.R.H.; BRAIN, S.D. et al. - The effect of Phoneutria nigriventer (armed spider) venom on arterial blood pressure of anaesthetised rats. Europ. J. Pharmacol., 298: 113-120,

Hanging by a thread...

It’s somewhat ironic that i am penning (or at last finishing) this article on Save a Spider day. Of course every thing seems to have its own day in this day and age so why not the humble arachnid? Of course it WOULD make far more sense for this special day to be at peak spider season in September/October but to be honest our eight legged friends can do with all the help they can get in the current scaremongering climate.

One of the gutter presses favourite things to write about, we have endured our fair share of outlandish and sensationalist stories regarding spiders. Normally these peak in the autumn and winter months as the spiders encroach upon our homes to escape the cold but the newspapers will generally print a story at any time. So when yet ANOTHER story about spiders hit my newsfeed i figured it would be a grand time to resurrect this half finished article, spruce it up and do MY bit for Save a Spider day….with this in mind please forgive the somewhat schizophrenic sense of tense and timing in this article.

So other than the common house spider (check out my article here) what other arachnid has been in the presses sights? Why no other than the Tube web spider Segestria, particularly S.florentina, a rather beautiful species with iridescent green chelicerae (the mouthparts that house the fangs). Now straight away I want you to lose any notion that this is in anyway similar to the Funnel Web spiders that inhabit Australia, the only similarities are they are both black and the both have 8 legs. Even Atrax robustus (the REAL Sydney Funnel Web) rarely bites people and deaths are extremely uncommon thanks to readily accessible antivenin. By nature spiders are shy and secretive creatures and really don’t have any interest in us at all.

Right where was I? Oh yes, the latest drivel that the gutter press are throwing at us. So the latest headline is 100 GREEN FANGED SPIDERS ATTACK FAMILY!!. Once again, the headline bears only a passing resemblance to the actual story within. The facts behind the story are that someone came across a large number of S.florentina in his garden (this particular species do not generally encroach upon the interiors of houses as they tend to live in the small cracks and holes in brick mortar) and noticed more of them at night, in the words of the 'victim'  (and this is a direct quote)

“I saw one that was the size of a tablespoon and I also managed to catch one after I saw it rush across my fence and then jump off onto the ground.

“It was playing dead and my brother said it was only a bit of dirt, but I put a glass over it and moved it a bit and it shot up.

“I let it go and it moved off so quickly it was unbelievable. As I said I’m not scared of spiders but these made me jump.

Ok, so size of tablespoon, check. S.florentina are a large species.

Caught one (In his hand? If so he clearly wasn't bitten)

and it played dead, fair enough. Spiders will do this, they know if they move they are easier to spot. It’s a very pacifist strategy though i'm sure you will agree.

I put a glass over it and it moved, yup once a spider realizes its possum strategy has failed it will make a dash for it, which it promptly did when the glass was removed. Note that the quote is it moved OFF. Not that it leapt fangs bared.

Right so lets look at the definition of ATTACK

Aggressive and violent act against a person or place: – so not playing dead and scarpering. Case solved, more of the Daily Stars nonsense. Please feel free to email the editor, I am. Including the definition of the word attack. Including THIS one.

Criticize or oppose fiercely and publicly: Wow that sure seems to meet the description of what the Tabloids are doing at the moment. So therefore I put it to you that the Press are attacking the spiders! I’ll go one further and people might think this is a step too far but I honestly belive this to be the case.

The unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims: That is the definition of TERRORISM. Now I am not for one second going to suggest that the papers themselves are a terrorist threat and I do not mean to belittle the danger or importance of real terrorist threats that beset the world at large, BUT the Tabloids are embarking on a campaign of misinformation and intimidation to sell more papers. They have the public so scared that they are living in fear of something that has been part of our lives for centuries without causing major issues and people are going round killing spiders en masse as a result. I have had enough. It is time to set the record straight once and for all about these fanciful tales of redback bites, worlds deadliest spiders in bunches of bananas and the general aura of fear that surrounds our misunderstood 8 legged friends. I will be doing a general article a bit later about the wonders of the spider world in an attempt to educate and amaze, and i am working on a scientific response to the ignorance surrounding Phoneutria in particular with a learned acquaintance, Dr Stuart Longhorn, but for now I find myself forced to respond to more outlandish journalism.

Segestria florentina, - Authors own photo. 

So, I have set the record straight regarding Segestria florentina, which I am extremely peeved that I cannot actually find (update:I finally found one!) let’s have a go at one of the urban legends. Brazilian Wandering Spiders found in bunches of bananas. For many years now people have been reporting finding spiders in imports of fruit. (I might add I have not been fortunate enough to do so no matter how many grapes and bananas I buy!) and this certainly is possible. Although many importers, particularly those for the larger supermarkets) endeavour to kill off anything that might be lurking within by chilling the fruit a lot of invertebrates can survive this and just slow down, becoming more active when they warm up again. So we have established that stowaways are certainly possible on imported exotic fruit but how likely is it to be the Infamous Brazilian Wandering Spider?

Well lets start by looking at the beastie itself. Firstly, Brazilian wandering spider is kind of a misnomer as there are a great deal many arachnids that would fall under that description. The Family Ctenidae contains many sub genus of which individuals are often misidentified as being the most venomous spider on the planet. Put bluntly not every spider with red chelicerae is our deadly arachnid. There are a great many benign species that have that characteristic, and also share a few others with the critter in question. The ones that are dangerous are Phoneutria (Greek for Murderess) and even then not all eight species of the genus have the same level of toxicity in their venom. Indeed it is P.fera and P.nigriventer that have the title of most Venomous spider in their pedipalps.

I'm going to impart a little bit of fact about the venom of Phoneutria nigriventer to you now. It is NASTY, it has caused fatalities and it is highly toxic. Thankfully there is an effective antivenin available and deaths lately have been few and far between. Phoneutria venom can cause paralysis and asphyxiation/cardiac arrest if left untreated. It also has an interesting side effect of sometimes causing painful erections that can last hours. Unfortunately it can also destroy the tissue at the base of the penis causing permanent impotence so its not all great. Nonetheless components of the venom are being actively researched for a treatment for impotence. So yes it is lethal (or at the very least unpleasant) stuff but how often do people die from it? Well not all that often at all as it happens (a whopping 14 since 1926!).

Phoneutria fera -  (photo by Stanislav Macík from Czech Arachnological Society - European Arachnology)

There are a number of reasons for this. One is that not every bite will be envenomed. Venom is precious to a spider, it will not waste it on something it has no chance of eating. Therefore they have the option of delivering a ‘dry’ bite in which little or no venom is delivered. This as you might imagine will cause proportionally less damage than a fully envenomed bite that has delivered a full load (such as Atrax robustus the Sydney Funnel Web spider is known for). Add to this the rather nomadic nature of the spider. Although they are becoming a more regular sight in Brazilian cities (certainly in the case of P.nigriventer) bites are still rare and mainly occur when the spider is disturbed and has no chance to throw its rather spectacular threat display. To my knowledge there has been only one recorded bite in Britain and that was non fatal though it did take the victim a week in hospital to recover. So don’t be scared of bananas the odds of discovering a spider in them is remote and the chances of that being Phoneutria are probably less than the chances of successfully navigating an asteroid field (3720 to 1 in case you were wondering )

BUT what about eggs on Bananas? I refer you to the recent newspaper stories where a housewife found some white fuzzy eggsacs on her bananas, now these stories seem to have been edited recently (for a start they actually bear pictures of an actual Phoneutria now) and the pest control companies are quoted as saying that it was a ‘tropical species’ (though the Headlines still dramatically proclaim ‘Worlds deadliest spider found in bananas!’) I'll not bother doing a great deal of debunking here. The photo that my friend Dr Stuart Longhorn has mocked up does a more than ample job of showing why its NOT Phoneutria eggs on bananas.

See that? A far cry from the small specks of mould that the ‘victim’ reported. Suffice to say if you had any kind of Phoneutria egg sac on your 'nanas you’d smeggin well notice. Huntsmen of various descriptions do turn up in imported fruit and there is a Millennium Falcon in an asteroid fields chance that it could be a Phoneutria species (as did actually happen recently – no one was harmed) but more often than not it will be a relatively benign huntsman that has inadvertently hitched a lift to our stores/shores. So whilst caution is advised hysteria certainly is not required.

You realize this article has taken nearly three weeks (and about 5 months to finish!) to write? Not because of writers block or any other issues on my part but simply because we don’t seem to be able to go any more than a few days without another daft spider story in the press.

I'll pay them all lip service or we will be here for an age:

Spider builds 6 foot web across garage! No it didn't you used a forced perspective photo to make it look that way and even compounded it by confirming that the spider in question is only 1.5 inches making your claim of the web’s size impossible as there is no way the spider fits into that webs diameter 48 times.

False widow causes woman to have thumb amputated! No it didn't necrotizing fasciitis did. It’s a rather nasty infection that as its name suggest causes necrosis or rotting of the flesh. You can get it from any open wound and the best defence is to keep the wound sterile. I freely admit it could be a spider that bit her that carried the infection but she could have got a paper cut and suffered the same fate. Just unfortunate.

Dead spider in kettle kills family of 6 in Africa! My word, how ridiculous! Surely I don’t even need to explain this one! Boiling a spider may well make your tea not taste nice but it wont kill you, it doesn’t matter how venomous it is. Besides at boiling te,peratures the venom would actually become LESS effective as some of the enzymes break down, as has been studied with Phoneutria venom.

A story so stupid it even makes spiders face palm

Puppy Sized spider found in Brazil. This is true, I have several. How big is a puppy though? Well when it is born, not very big. And if it is a Chihuahua also not very big! Its all a case of perspective. For the record Theraposa blondi and its close relative stirmi have been known about for over a hundred of years and can reach a whopping 12 inches in leg span. Therefore if the puppy is 12” or less then yes the spider is puppy sized. Moving on…..

Theraposa strimi, the author's own spider - 9 inch legspan

Pamphobeteus antinous - authors own spider. 10" legspan

Spider burrows into mans stomach: The recent (well it was in October) story goes that a an individual returning from a tropical destination went to the doctors with a complaint of pain in his stomach and an interesting mark on his torso. Upon investigation it was discovered that a creature had burrowed into his skin leaving a long track mark on his body. Upon extraction this creature was apparently a spider. Note, no pictures of the culprit are available.

It is very unlikely that this is a spider. Although they don't have lungs that work the same way as ours a spider still requires air, now some spiders are known for burrowing and it is no secret that they do prefer enclosed spaces. Some other parasite or interloper certainly but i very much doubt a spider would be capabe of what is seen here. It should also be noted that not one single peice of corroborating information is presented, The only information was that the creature was the size of a match head. If you ask me it sounds a lot like a mite or tick which ARE known for burrowing into skin.

Spider bite causes ebola in uk housewife! Ok I made that one up but its no less outlandish than many of the other headlines….

I have lost time of the amount of times i have said this but here we go again...

spiders are NOT out to get you!. IF spiders felt the same way about us as so many of us do about them then I have no doubt that we would be in some kind of danger. But they don’t. Spiders want to be left alone, they want to eat and breed and go about their spidery little lives and that is about it. The same as most of the other life forms on this planet. It is us Homo Sapiens that seem to have the adjustment issue.

Spiders really are wonderful amazing and interesting creatures that deserve our respect and understanding. I’ll be endeavouring to show this in a series of articles that i am working on (which wont take as long as this one to publish!) In the meantime Dr Longhorn and I have some work to do regarding the misconception around Banana spiders. Watch out journalists we are coming for you with research and facts, we've had enough of your bullshit and your lies….

Home Is Where The Spider Is

A note from the author: Now before I begin proper on this latest missive, allow me to extend my thanks to all the readers of my article The False Scourge of the False Widow and its fellows. I’m glad to say that together we really did make a difference. It is noticeable everywhere, from the general lack of panic that it displayed amongst the public to the dismissive nature of comments when stories about Steatoda nobilis rear their ugly head and the media do their best to instil fear into us in a bid to sell papers and get hits. So thank you, my aim was to reassure the public and save a few spider lives and it is extremely gratifying to see that in some small way this objective has been achieved.

It’s nearing that time again; the nights draw in and the weather grows colder. Can you feel it? It’s time for the tabloids to start spouting their spurious lies again, and this means that the gutter press have had to find another subject for their scaremongering. This time it’s an all too common spider friend that they have in their sights: the house spider. I for one find this absolutely hilarious, as I would struggle to think of a more benign arachnid.

Of course not everyone will be so tickled. House spiders (Tegenaria domestica to the press) unfortunately tick all of the boxes when it comes to people’s problems with spiders. They are large, hairy, prolific and fast. They are also completely harmless! I can understand a little the concern over Steatoda, they look a bit like the infamous Black Widow and can inflict a reasonably painful bite. They are also something that people have only recently started to notice thanks to a recent rapid expansion throughout most of the southern UK, though they don’t seem to have quite made it to the northern reaches. They are an introduced species and therefore their range is not quite nationwide just yet. Tegenaria, on the other hand have been here for much longer; you’ve all seen them and we should all know that they pose us no threat.

Beyond this it is certainly worth mentioning that the press are doing their best to spice things up a bit at least. Whether it’s the obsessed Daily Star, with their nearly constant arachnid-hating, or one of the other tabloids, spiders have once again started to make it back into the news in various ways, normally employing words such as “invading”, “rampaging”, “attacking”, or other such scary terms. Now, as it is that season again I shall bring my efforts to debunking each of these in turn, but this time around I am defending the house spider and the hobo spider that the press currently have their knickers in a twist over.

Let’s start with a few facts. Tegenaria is a genus of spider that is not invasive: in fact it has been introduced to much of the rest of the world from Europe! It consists of around 100 species, of which we enjoy just a few here in the UK. I’m not going to get too deeply involved in differentiating between the myriad subspecies as a: nomenclature and taxonomy of arachnids are headache-inducing at best and are also constantly changing, with Tegenaria currently under revision and some species seem destined for Erategina, so all these scientific names are soon to be redundant anyway. Suffice it to say it can be very difficult to tell spiders apart at times. So if many learned Arachnologists can sometimes struggle with these things – often a conclusive ID can only be obtained with microscopic inspection – how are we supposed to believe that a pest controller or nurse can make a positive identification, often without seeing the actual specimen?

Anyway, back to Tegenaria (or Erategina). Yes, they are the archetypical ‘creepy crawly spider’ that people tend to see as the days get colder. More often than not you will encounter a male out and about looking for a female to mate with/not get eaten by. These poor blighters have enough to worry about without contending with a book or boot heading in their direction! You will often see them late at night, normally scurrying across the floor. I guess it is the movement that is one of the things that really bothers people; they are easily startled and bolt rather than retreat. This rapid movement can easily be misinterpreted as an attack. I have never heard of a house spider attacking anyone. They are a ridiculously timid species and their only thought is for flight, not fight.

House spider, photo by Jade Masters

I mean, come on guys, this is a creature that cannot even negotiate a bathtub! How scary can they possibly be? It doesn’t help that they have a face that only a mother could love. They lack the adorable characteristics of peacock spiders (Maratus volans, for instance) or even the photogenic garden spiders (Araneus) and the proportions are those that will invoke the worst nightmares of the majority of common folk, being all gangly, hairy and lightning fast. However they are great at keeping the number of pests down and apart from the males you see on a quest for nookie, a very shy species that prefer to secrete themselves in extensive tunnel-like webs in corners of sheds. If you are to come across one it is more than likely to be in the bath as, as previously mentioned, they are incredibly inept at escaping the smooth sides of your average bathtub.

So with that introduction to the house spider, let’s have a look at a couple of the stories, shall we? To be clear, I will not be posting links to these tales of arachnid terror as I refuse to add to the advertising revenue of these scaremongering swine. It all started with headlines proclaiming Giant Spiders Set To Invade UK Homes This Autumn, Warn Experts, courtesy of the Mirror. And not to be outdone, the Daily Star gave usAttack Of The Giant Spiders: Scorching Summer Leaves Beasts Poised To Invade Britain.

Despite the fact that experts are warning no such thing – the headline is horribly out of context to the actual quotes given – this is something that happens every year. It gets cold. Spiders like it warm, spiders come inside. It’s nothing new and certainly not worthy of a headline, but I guess it is the kind of thing that will sell papers. I’m also unsure on how any arachnid can invade (surely one of the gutter press’ favourite verbs) Britain from within Britain: I was always of the impression that invasions came from outside of our sovereign lands. Maybe the editor of the Daily Star can help me out with this. I suspect my invitation will go unacknowledged, however.

One point I will concede is that the spiders do seem to be a bit bigger this year than in previous years. There are probably a few reasons for this: one is the weather of late, which has been ideal for the reproduction of the small flying insects that form the primary food source for the spiders. Of course, something else that may have resulted in a boom of prey insects is people indiscriminately slaughtering their predators around this time last year: you only have yourselves to blame, people! Anyway, it gets cold, spiders come in, you’ll see more spiders. Nothing to see here; move along.

After that non-event, they had another go at terrifying the public with the following beauty: They’re Invading! Terrified Couple Under Attack From Aggressive Venomous Spiders. Well, I suppose we should be thankful that they have started to make the correct distinction between venomous and poisonous at last! This aside, they’ve realised they need to give the story a bit of a twist to keep people interested, so we are introduced to a new arachnid terror: the Hobo spider, an “ultra-aggressive monster spider”. Mysteriously, none of the articles or ‘victims’ seem to be able to produce one, instead triumphantly brandishing dead male house spiders. Apparently, “Liam, dad of 3” has been bitten by one of these attack-minded killing machines and has a horrific wound that’s expected to take three months to heal – it looks a bit like a cigarette burn. His partner has encountered and killed around 30 of these monsters, although none of the dead spiders they portray seem to be particularly oversize.

Hobo spiders do exist. They are called Tegenaria agrestis, from the Latin for ‘field’ – their primary habitat. The effects of their bite are largely undocumented as there have been very few bites to go on. They are not aggressive and not monster. They are not native to England and I have never actually seen one in this country. All the pictures I have seen thus far purporting to be a ‘Hobo spider’ are a completely different species. Should Liam’s condition have developed from a spider bite I would think it was once again from a secondary infection rather than the venom itself. Describing to the spider to the intrigued journalist, Liam stated, “their bodies are pretty much normal size but it’s the legs – the front legs are the size of your hand.” The quote appeared immediately below a picture of a house spider barely bigger the one penny piece it was depicted with.

In a similar story involving a four-year-old child, the culprit is described as a 5” house spider even though the pictures attached to the article are of a garden spider (Araneus diadematus) and jumping spider (probably Salticus sp.) respectively. Five inches? The jumping spider maxes out at 5mm, so I am already taking this article with a big pinch of Salticus. (Sorry!). Secondly the picture of the rash on the poor child seems to follow an unusual and atypical distribution pattern, affecting the torso only. That’s a bit odd. Any rash caused by a bite would spread across the body, not be impeded by clothing. In fact, a rash like the one pictured could be something altogether viral or a reaction to a chemical on the skin, not envenomation from a bite. This could be an allergic reaction to a fabric softener for all we know!

UK Jumping spider (possibly Heliophanus flavipes) Photo courtesy of Simon Robson

According to the story, the staff at a walk-in medical centre – not even a hospital – “discovered an insect was to blame“ for the child’s condition and prescribed a course of tablets: a surprisingly well-informed and accurate diagnosis without bloodwork or consultation with an expert, even if we forget that spiders aren’t insects. I’m unsure what tablets you would prescribe for envenomation; however, I suspect that it may have been some kind of antihistamine, a drug family commonly used for allergic reactions. Regardless, it wasn’t considered serious enough for a trip to the hospital. There are endless things that could have caused this kind of reaction: the aforementioned chemical agent, a virus, flea bites, bed bug bites, dust mites bites (or at least the reaction to them) – but no, plainly the spider was to blame. I have never heard of a house spider biting anyone; it’s certainly possible, but every single one I have ever encountered, and we are talking hundreds here, has scarpered. So, I’m sorry, the evidence just doesn’t support the story in this instance. Notwithstanding the quality of these scaremongering reports – bad grammar is rife within – and the hilarious amount of ill-considered misinformation that they endlessly come up with, the only thing that I am horrified by is that this kind of reporting is not regulated in some way.

Now, I am under no impression that this is going to end any time soon; this has already been raging for some time, and it has started to reach a point where once again I have been compelled to say something about it. Spiders have few enough friends as it is: even members of their own (inherently cannibalistic) species want them dead. Let’s not add to their difficulties. Should you encounter one, just trap it under a glass, slide a bit of card underneath and pop it outside. If it’s a male, as it nearly always is – you can tell by their enlarged bulbous pedipalps or feelers – then it likely doesn’t have all that long to live anyway and it is really not interested in you in any event.

At the end of the day, a spider is not smart: they lack the brainpower for reasoned thought and every single encounter with another organism is probably best characterised thusly: “can I eat it or is it going to eat me?” The first response will result in a bite. Venom is used to kill prey; no other reason. The venom kills the prey, or at least renders it helpless, so that the spider can eat up all the juices at its leisure. If it is not something the spider can eat, then its primary reaction will be to flee. Spiders are not aggressive: nearly without exception they will not launch themselves at something they have no hope of eating, particularly not something that is several hundred or thousand times bigger than they, and waste precious venom in the process. Spiders can be defensive, reacting to provocation, but even then a bite will be a very last resort.

So don’t fear them. I don’t expect you to love them like I do, but maybe find a way to respect them. They are fascinating creatures – I will be following this up with a more generalised article in an attempt to persuade you – and it is unfortunate that they key into all our deepest primordial fears. Should you encounter a spider and be unsure of what type it is, don’t forget that there are several aids to identification. There is even a British Spider Identification group on Facebook that will gladly ID any specimen, preferably alive – it might even be me that comments.

So until next time, keep calm and carry on. After all, it’s only a spider.

Weave Had Nothing But Bad Press

This article, which i wrote when the False Widow Hysteria was at it's height, was originally hosted at https://elwellpress.wordpress.com/2013/10/24/weave-had-nothing-but-bad-press/identification-guide/

It has been reproduced here with the kind permission of Christie Louise Tucker

So like a bothersome pest – completely unlike our subject, which sits in a web and bothers no-one – the horror stories about deadly spiders just will not go away. Since the publication of my well-received first article, the gutter press have continued to spout their hysterical headlines: everything from vulnerable single mothers being attacked by spiders to babies eating False Widows, before resorting to writing about a mother just seeing and killing spiders – even though none of those spiders that she had killed was Steatoda nobilis. Bravo!


It’s all getting a little silly and thankfully, due to the efforts of myself and many likeminded individuals, the message seems to be getting though. Increasingly, the articles are being lambasted by the general citizenry for what they are: scurrilous attempts at scaremongering. So, while I’m pleased that people are now a little more informed about Steatoda nobilis I feel it would be remiss of us if I didn’t try to impart the same level of education on the part of Latrodectus mactans, the Black Widow spider, the new target of the tabloids’ sensationalist hyperbole with headlines like “Black Widow spider invasion from US sparks fear of lethal bites.

So we’d like to introduce you to the real Black Widow, and hopefully by the end of this article we can turn the much-feared Black Widow into the much respected Black Widow instead.

What’s in a name?

The Black Widow’s very moniker is designed to spread fear, coined for the female’s penchant for killing and eating the male spider shortly after mating. Far from being the Black Widow’s particular party trick, the males’ fate in the spider kingdom is frequently -although not always- to be eaten by the female. From a logical perspective this can make sense and is not simply a cruel act by Mrs Spider. Male spiders usually die shortly after reaching maturity. Their biological purpose is to become mature and mate. Once this has been achieved the male is redundant. He has passed on his genetic code and his existence is no longer biologically imperative. Please note, however, that the male does not willingly offer himself up: he has a sense of self-preservation and will likely try to escape after performing the deed. They just don’t always make it.

From the female’s perspective, she is about to lay hundreds of eggs which she will wrap up in a silken sac and defend with her life. Therefore, it is sensible to absorb as much nutrition as possible, and a male spider makes a fine meal. The male is sacrificed as a cruel necessity. So technically, all spiders have the potential to be ‘widows’ and there’s no real reason for Latrodectus to claim sole rights to the name. But then I guess just calling it the clumsy black-and-red spider doesn’t really have the same ring to it, eh? For the record, the Genus name Latrodectus comes from the Greek for ‘biting in secret’- they don’t just name these spiders at random, you know!

Taken by Stuart Longhorn, Latrodectus Sp. in natural habitat in Central America

The lady herself

Just like Steatoda, the False Widows –including the species S.nobilis, the Noble False Widow of recent reports – it is the females of Latrodectus that bite. The females are easy to distinguish being many times larger and bulkier than the males. The Eastern Black Widow Spider (Latrodectus mactans) is one of 32 confirmed species, and is usually jet black, (although some variations with dorsal red markings exist) with a highly distinctive red hourglass marking on the underneath of the abdomen of both sexes, although it is more vivid on a female. Certainly experts should not be troubled with the same volume of mistaken Identity cases that Steatoda has caused, resembling as it does so many other UK species currently being slaughtered in its stead. This said there is significant variety amongst Latrodectus with many weird and wonderful variants each more colourful than the last.

Despite the papers’ reports about the abundance and deadliness of Black Widows in the UK, they are found here in very small numbers. They came over in imports from the US, this much is true, but they are isolated to just a few small colonies in the south in and are not likely to be seen. The main reason for this is that they like to stay in their webs and are not likely to attack. In fact, Latrodectus are comically uncoordinated when not in their haphazard webs and could quite comfortably be described as clumsy; certainly more Bridget Jones than Femme Fatale. Subsequently, you are very unlikely to see one or even be close to one, and given their distinctive markings and lack of similarity to other species it is likely that reports will be few and far between. They are also rather small, reaching no more than 4cm or so. So in a nutshell, you’re looking for small black spiders that have a distinctive, easily-seen hourglass shape on the ‘belly’, and stay in a haphazard-looking web. Most of us will go our entire lives without ever seeing one.

Taken by Stuart Longhorn, Latrodectus Sp. in natural habitat in Central America

The reports

We’ll take an article from the stalwart of shoddy reporting, the Daily Star, who have featured a spider story every day this week and show no signs of stopping: Black Widow spider invasion from US sparks fear of lethal bites. This article should be issued to GCSE Media Studies classes for careful language analysis. First, this must be the first time ‘six’ has constituted an invasion. Secondly, all of Graeme Skinner’s quotes have been taken out of context. The line “Black Widows have come in this year” is a statement, not a warning: they come in every year, along with many other species that don’t get reported or become an established species. “Experts fear there could be widespread deaths,” but mysteriously wouldn’t go on the record to comment further on that? Thirdly, the only thing “terrifying Brits” is the tabloids’ misjudged reports.

Ricki Whitmore may have suffered a gruesome leg wound, but it was almost certainly not from the venom or the bite; secondary infection is the most likely cause. Also, “it is only a matter of time before they kill” is a dangerously misleading overstatement, and is directly contradicted in Mr Skinner’ next quote. For the record, nearly anyone can get a Dangerous Wild Animals License, provided certain criteria are met and the license fee (which varies hugely from borough to borough) is paid. We at the Elwell Press feel that the spider’s bite is the least of the Star editorial team’s worries – ifLatrodectus could engage a libel lawyer, the arachnophobes of Wapping would really be in trouble.

The bite

If you are ever unfortunate enough to be bitten by a Latrodectus species, then seek medical attention immediately, retaining the spider’s body in a secure container for examination if possible. Although unlikely to be fatal to a healthy adult, being bitten will be a deeply unpleasant experience. Typical symptoms are localised swelling, nausea, tremors, a fever, and painful muscle cramping. Like Steatoda,Latrodectus has a neurotoxic venom, although it will certainly not rot or dissolve your flesh. Latrodectusbites have killed in the past, although fatalities are extremely rare. The young or the old are particularly vulnerable as their bodies lack the capacity to safely metabolize the venom. However, an effective anti-venom against toxic components of Latrodectusvenom has existed for many years, and been regularly used throughout the world for effective treatment of bites.

As worrying as that sounds, there is another glimmer of good news. As stated previously, you are extremely unlikely to ever encounter a Black Widow spider. The chances of coming across one are infinitesimally small; in spite of recent claims, they exist in tiny numbers in the UK and, like all spiders, will avoid human interaction as far as possible. This round of fearmongering will backfire on the papers as the lack of sightings fail to hold readers’ interest. This correspondent has been asked to identify a great many spiders in photographs of varying quality, some of which were barely recognisable as spiders. None of these have been Latrodectus, and only about 20 percent have even been Steatoda. It would be astonishing should widespread reports of Black Widow spiders surface.

In time, Latrodectus may well become an established species in the UK. As climate change continues to be a powerful force in dictating animal habitat and behaviour, we may well see, in several years’ time, Black Widow spiders becoming more prevalent. In that eventuality, what will we do? Well, I guess we’ll just have to deal with it the same way that other countries where these spiders are abundant do: with caution but not panic, with respect but not fear. Leave well enough alone and no harm will come to you. Deaths from Latrodectus venom are extremely uncommon, normally only occurring in freak instances where multiple bites are recorded.

In the UK, we do not have overtly dangerous or lethal species present in the wild in any great numbers. From an exotic animal perspective, we are a rather boring island. Should we ever reach the stage where such potentially harmful invertebrates are more commonplace, then we will simply need to adapt. After all, if Latrodectus ever became that much of a problem an antivenom is readily available; that there is no antivenom for Steatoda bites should indicate the seriousness with which their bites are to be regarded. So let’s not lose our heads when we have extremely isolated and small numbers of a relatively medically significant spider like Latrodectus present as an interloper from foreign shores. Stiff upper lip and all, chaps! Best foot forward, and in true British fashion, let’s keep calm and carry on.